Somebody has rebuilt Elizabeth Holmes’s desk. Not a sketch of it, not a reconstruction for a documentary: a browsable simulation of a 2015 era office, with a laptop you can open, a phone you can scroll, and a Theranos Edison machine you can switch on.
The part that makes it more than a gimmick is where the contents came from. The emails, texts, slide decks and internal documents in it are not invented. The builder says all of it is pulled from 1,169 real exhibits entered as evidence in the federal fraud trials of Holmes and her former partner Sunny Balwani.
The short version
- What it is: Theranos.world, a first person browser simulation of Elizabeth Holmes’s working environment
- Who built it: an engineer who posts as @bolau_, who works at a company called Extend
- What is in it: a reported 1,169 documents taken from exhibits used in the Holmes and Balwani criminal trials, plus hidden Easter eggs
- What you can do: read her email, scroll her phone, page through internal decks, and run a simulated Edison blood analyzer
- The joke in the detail: the simulated Edison returns results stamped not for medical use
- Why now: it is timed to You Can See Everything, the Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim documentary A24 releases in US theaters on October 16
What it actually feels like to use
The framing is deliberately mundane. You are sitting at a desk. The operating system is styled like OS X Yosemite and the phone is running something that looks like iOS 9, which is the detail people latched onto fastest, because it quietly fixes the whole thing in time.
One user summed it up neatly, noting that the period correct software let them date the scene to 2015 without being told. That year is not a random choice. It is the year the company came apart.
Run the Edison and the simulation does something quietly clever. It gives you a number, and then it labels that number as medically worthless. Which is precisely the gap at the center of the criminal case: a device that produced output, presented as a diagnosis, that should never have been trusted by a patient.
A refresher on why the Edison matters
For anyone who came to this story late, the Edison was the entire proposition. Holmes pitched a miniaturized analyzer that could run a long menu of blood tests from a few drops taken by fingerstick, which would have made routine blood work cheaper, faster and far less unpleasant. She described it as the iPod of healthcare.
It did not work. Reporting by John Carreyrou at the Wall Street Journal, published in October 2015, established that the device could not reliably do what the company claimed, and that Theranos was running patient samples on conventional commercial analyzers while presenting the results as its own technology’s output.
| The claim | What was actually happening |
|---|---|
| A full test menu from a fingerstick | Only a small fraction of tests ran on Theranos hardware at all |
| Proprietary breakthrough device | Many samples were processed on modified off the shelf commercial analyzers |
| Results doctors could act on | Accuracy problems led to test results being voided and corrected |
| Validated by major partners | Validation claims in investor materials were a central plank of the fraud case |
Holmes was convicted on four counts in January 2022 and sentenced that November to 11 years and 3 months. She reported to federal prison in May 2023.
The timeline the site drops you into
The simulation freezes you in the last normal moment, right before the reporting landed. Seeing it on a timeline makes the choice of 2015 look less like set dressing and more like the point.
The documentary it is promoting
None of this appeared out of nowhere. You Can See Everything is directed by Nathan Fielder, whose work on The Rehearsal and The Curse made him a specialist in exactly this register of discomfort, alongside Lance Oppenheim. It follows Holmes and her partner Billy Evans across the 34 days before she reported to prison, with the couple allowing a crew to film them throughout.
It premiered as a surprise screening at Telluride in September and A24 puts it in US theaters on October 16. No streaming date has been announced. Reviews so far describe it as awkward and slippery rather than revelatory, which sounds about right for the subject and the director.
Fielder has said communication with Holmes and Evans broke down after filming, which means the person at the center of it reportedly has not seen it. She is, by all accounts, aware of the attention. She posted a selfie after the trailer went out.
It is marketing, and it says so. Theranos.world is a fan project, but not a disinterested one. Per TechCrunch, it also serves to promote a watch party for the film hosted by the builder’s employer. The document count and the sourcing claims come from the person who made it. The underlying exhibits are genuinely public record, which is what separates this from a deepfake, but nobody has independently verified that the archive is complete or faithfully presented.
Why this format keeps appearing
Theranos.world is not the first of these. A site called Jmail did something similar with Jeffrey Epstein’s released emails, presenting them inside a fake Gmail interface. The pattern is the same: take a pile of court documents that almost nobody will read in their original form, and wrap them in an interface people already know how to operate.
That is a genuinely effective piece of design thinking, and it is worth being honest about why. A court exhibit list is unreadable. A folder of PDFs is a chore. An inbox is a thing you have opened ten thousand times, so you already know where to click, and the friction between you and the material drops to almost nothing.
The flip side is that the interface carries implications of its own. Putting real documents inside a simulated desktop invites you to read them as a narrative with a protagonist, in a sequence the builder chose. That is a reasonable thing for a piece of storytelling to do. It is just not the same as reading the record.
It also lands in a year when the line between a convincing simulation and a real one has gotten uncomfortably thin. We recently covered a system where nearly half the people who video called an AI believed it was a human being. A period accurate fake desktop is harmless by comparison, and it is a useful reminder of how little effort a persuasive interface now takes.
The part that has not dated at all
The reason the Theranos story keeps getting retold is not that the fraud was unusually sophisticated. It is that the conditions that let it run are still here.
Holmes raised enormous sums on a promise about a product that journalists, not investors, eventually checked. The valuations in that pitch look almost quaint now, in a market where a voice AI company can double to $22 billion in seven months. The due diligence problem has not changed. The numbers got bigger.
The health specific lesson is sharper. Theranos was dangerous rather than merely dishonest because its output went to patients and doctors who acted on it. That boundary is being renegotiated again right now, with real care: in Utah, regulators have started letting an AI write prescriptions, with a doctor still required to sign off. Note which part of that sentence does the work. The sign off is the whole safeguard, and it is exactly the kind of check Theranos routed around.
The bottom line
Theranos.world is a well made piece of promotional work built on top of genuinely public material. It is worth twenty minutes of your time, partly because the documents are interesting and partly because the format is a small lesson in how presentation changes what people are willing to read.
Just hold on to what it is. You are not sitting at Elizabeth Holmes’s desk. You are reading a curated selection of trial exhibits inside a nostalgic interface, released a week before a film that needs an audience. The exhibits are real. The desk is a set.
Sources and further reading
- UNILAD Tech: Bizarre website lets you be Elizabeth Holmes for the day
- TechCrunch: Pretend you’re sitting at Elizabeth Holmes’ desk on this weirdly detailed website
- SFist: Weird website lets you sit at Elizabeth Holmes’s desk at Theranos
- Screen Daily: You Can See Everything review
- Background on You Can See Everything, the Fielder and Oppenheim documentary
About this article: GeekBlog covers U.S. technology news, AI, phones, smartwatches and gaming. Every story is written and checked under our Editorial Policy. Spotted a mistake or have a story tip? Contact our editors.
