Close Menu
GeekBlog

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Why States, Not Washington, May Solve the Data Center Water Fight

    July 8, 2026

    Oppo Find X9 Ultra: The Camera Phone That Has Reviewers Rethinking the Rankings

    July 8, 2026

    AI Chatbots Are Killing Search Clicks. Here Is Who Wins Instead

    July 7, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Threads
    GeekBlog
    • Home
    • Mobile
    • Tech News
    • Blog
    • How-To Guides
    • AI & Software
    Facebook
    GeekBlog
    Home»Tech News»NASA has shuffled its Artemis rockets. But what of the lunar landers?
    Tech News

    NASA has shuffled its Artemis rockets. But what of the lunar landers?

    Michael ComaousBy Michael ComaousMarch 6, 20262 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link
    NASA has shuffled its Artemis rockets. But what of the lunar landers?
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Copy Link

    There are many details about the EPO/CoLA orbit in the research paper, but critically, its closest point to the Moon lies just 100 km above the Moon’s surface (the apolune distance is 6,500 km). For many landing sites, the paper notes, a Human Landing System vehicle can perform a single burn to reach a much lower orbit.

    As part of his change in plans, Isaacman said the Space Launch System rocket’s upper stage would be “standardized” for Artemis IV and beyond. That means the first lunar landing mission will use a new upper stage, likely the Centaur V built by United Launch Alliance. This will have more propulsive capabilities than the current rocket, so it is possible that for Artemis IV, Orion could reach an even more favorable orbit (i.e., closer to the Moon, requiring less energy to reach the surface) than EPO/CoLA.

    Can Starship be accelerated?

    At the end of the day, it’s helpful to find new orbits and relax requirements where appropriate. But it will still be up to the lander contractors to deliver the goods, and for NASA, the sooner the better.

    Last November, Ars looked at several ways Starship might be brought online faster as a lunar lander. Perhaps the biggest problem with using Starship as a lander is the need to fly multiple uncrewed tanker missions to refuel Starship in low-Earth orbit before it transits to the Moon and awaits a crew aboard Orion. This necessitates an estimated one- or two-dozen launches.

    The best solution we could come up with was flying an optimized, expendable Starship tanker stage that would maximize propellant delivery per flight. When asked about this, though, SpaceX founder Elon Musk shot down the idea. Once Starship begins flying at rate, Musk believes, a dozen or more tanker missions per lunar flight will not pose a major impediment.

    So it should come as no surprise that SpaceX has not proposed significant changes to its Human Landing System architecture. Rather, in response to NASA’s desire to accelerate the Artemis timeline, the company has indicated that it will prioritize the Human Landing System more as part of the Starship program.

    Source: arstechnica.com

    NASA
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleTriZetto confirms 3.4M people’s health and personal data was stolen during breach
    Next Article 11 Best USB Flash Drives (2026): Pen Drives, Thumb Drives, Memory Sticks
    Michael Comaous
    • Website

    Michael Comaous is a dedicated professional with a passion for technology, innovation, and creative problem-solving. Over the years, he has built experience across multiple industries, combining strategic thinking with hands-on expertise to deliver meaningful results. Michael is known for his curiosity, attention to detail, and ability to explain complex topics in a clear and approachable way. Whether he’s working on new projects, writing, or collaborating with others, he brings energy and a forward-thinking mindset to everything he does.

    Related Posts

    7 Mins Read

    Why States, Not Washington, May Solve the Data Center Water Fight

    6 Mins Read

    AI Chatbots Are Killing Search Clicks. Here Is Who Wins Instead

    7 Mins Read

    The EV Market’s 2026 Reset: Why Prices Crashed After the Tax Credit Died

    6 Mins Read

    Anthropic Is Reportedly Building Its Own AI Chip, and Samsung Wants In

    6 Mins Read

    Commodore’s Callback Flip Phone Is Betting You Want Less Phone, Not More

    4 Mins Read

    Inside Hyundai’s Metaplant, Where AI and Robots Build Cars to Order

    Top Posts

    Best Stores for Buying MP3 and Digital Music You Can Keep Forever

    August 2, 202560 Views

    Zip to APK: Convert ZIP Archives Into Installable Android Packages Quickly

    January 16, 202620 Views

    LG’s new $2,246 5K ultrawide monitor promises pro specs even creatives might struggle to justify

    August 2, 202518 Views
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest tech news from FooBar about tech, design and biz.

    Most Popular

    Discord will require a face scan or ID for full access next month

    February 9, 2026770 Views

    Best Stores for Buying MP3 and Digital Music You Can Keep Forever

    August 2, 2025722 Views

    Trade in your old phone and get up to $1,100 off a new iPhone 17 at AT&T – here’s how

    September 10, 2025374 Views
    Our Picks

    Why States, Not Washington, May Solve the Data Center Water Fight

    July 8, 2026

    Oppo Find X9 Ultra: The Camera Phone That Has Reviewers Rethinking the Rankings

    July 8, 2026

    AI Chatbots Are Killing Search Clicks. Here Is Who Wins Instead

    July 7, 2026

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    Facebook
    • About Us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    © 2026 GeekBlog

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.